It doesn't get us any further with the debate about whether Covid was engineered.
1.further词性含义和成分(状语还是宾补)?
——作状语,表示程度。
2.with…修饰谁?
——with...也是状语,修饰动词get。
It doesn't get us any further with the debate about whether Covid was engineered.
1.further词性含义和成分(状语还是宾补)?
2.with…修饰谁?
网友所说的get far (with)和get sb far (with)在词典中是有说明的,仅以韦氏高阶词典get词条为例:
always followed by an adverb
a [no object] : to make progress in some activity
He hasn't gotten far with the essay. [=he hasn't made much progress with the essay]
b [+ object] : to cause or help (someone) to make progress
All that effort didn't really get us very far.
所以,网友句中的further应该解释为副词far的比较级形式。韦氏词典的“取得进步,进展”和“使…取得进步,进展”应该是一种引申义。
牛津高阶(9版)get词条17解释为:[l]+adv./prep. to arrive at or reach a place or point 其例句为: I haven't got very far with the book I'm reading.这里的get far可以字面理解为“到达很远距离”,可引申为“取得进步,进展”。
此外,韦氏高阶对get有这样的解释:always followed by an adverb or preposition,[+object]: to cause (someone or something) to move or go,如果根据这个义项,get sb far可以解释为“使…移动很远距离”,引申为“使...取得进步,进展”。
至于句中get us any further,倾向于把any further解释为状语,表示抽象意义的距离长度,或一种程度,根据韦氏词典的解释,这种状语应该是必具性的。如果把any further解释为宾语补语,一般来说,宾语与宾语补语会构成逻辑上的主谓或主表关系,如果单独说we are far/further,恐怕不会成立。至于with词组,可以解释为谓语动词get或谓语动词及其补足成分get us any further的方面状语。
个人看法,仅供参考。