在章振邦《新编高级英语语法》（第一版)388页，有这样一个句子：

She wisely didn't attempt to apologize.(= lt was wise of her not to attempt to apologize.)

章教授的解释是：有时评注性状语也可采取中位。

按照评注性状语的定义，应该指的是说话人对整个句子内容进行评论，而句子内容应该是“她没有试图道歉”这个主谓事件。而lt is wise of sb to do和lt is wise for sb to do的区别是：前者强调人，后者强调行为。

所以，我有如下疑问：

1. 如果按照评注性状语分析，应该对句子内容进行评论，即对事件评论，而不是强调人的性质，所以，上述句子的准确改写应该是什么？是否可以是It was wise for her not to have attempted to apologize.?

2. 是否可以把wisely理解为主语下加状语，进而She wisely didn't attempt to apologize.解释为等于It was wise of her not to attempt to apologize.=She was wise not to attempt to apologize.?

补充一下夸克等人对“下加状语”的论述：

lf we move a sentence adjunct from E position to l or M, we can do more than allow another element to be highlighted by end-focus(cf18.9). We may appear to narrow the application of the adverbial from the sentence as a whole so that it now seems to have a special relation with the subject. This is particularly true with process adverbials of the manner subclass(cf8.5).

Compare [1] where casually is such an adverbial,functioning as a sentence adjunct with [2] where the function has been narrowed to subjunct status:

Leslie greeted the stranger casually. ('in a casual offhand manner', his greeting was casual) [1]

Casually, Leslie greeted the stranger.('Leslie was casual, offhand, when she greeted the stranger') [2]