感官动词的用法与特例

大多数资料中归结的感官动词用法如下(以see为例):

  1. see sb/sth do
  2. see sb/sth doing
  3. see sb/sth done

进行思考搜寻,还会看到一些地方列出了如下用法:

  1. see sb/sth being done (看到……正在被,片段性,https://www.cpsenglish.com/question/55791

在被动语态下,会看到如下用法:

  1. sb/sth be seen to do
  2. sb/sth be seen doing

那么请问,是否存在:

  1. sb/sth be seen done (被看见被……)? 如:John was seen beaten by several boys.  ?
  2. sb/sth be seen being done (被看见正在被……)?

疑问二:

部分词不可用于上述部分用法,如watch/notice sb do sth有被动语态吗 一文提到不存在be watched/noticed to do这一用法。 有回答提到剑桥语法中说不存在 observe/notice sb/sth done 的用法。那么除去以上两个例子外,还有没有类似的特例(某个、某些感官动词不可用于某几条用法)?

请先 登录 后评论

1 个回答

曹荣禄  
擅长:动词用法,句法问题

你何不自己读一下剑桥英语语法对此问题的论述,掌握第一手资料呢?以下为该书1236-1237页的有关内容:

3Bii: matrix passive allowed (I heard them arrive/arriving ; I heard the window broken)
[42]
feel TU (B)  hear TU (B)   notice TU B   observe TU (B)   overhear (B)   see1 TU (B)
watch B
These verbs, together with smell from Class 3Cii below, are the verbs of sensory per
ception. All take bare infinitivals, while those where the ‘B’ is parenthesised take a to
infinitival as well. For see we have the following possibilities:
[43] i a. We saw Kim leave the bank.       b.Kim was seen leave the bank.
ii a. We saw Kim leaving the bank.          b. Kim was seen leaving the bank.
iii a. We saw Spurs beaten by United.      b. ? Spurs were seen beaten by United.
iv a. We saw him to be an impostor.        b. He was seen to be an impostor.
We put the to-infinitival last because this does not represent the primary sense: it is not
a matter of sensory perception but of mental inference. In this construction, see behaves
like the verbs of cognition/saying (Class 3Aii), following their pattern of favouring a
matrix passive and the verb be in the subordinate clause, of allowing the perfect (He was
seen to have altered the figures), and of alternating with the finite construction (We saw
that he was an imposter).
The primary sense, illustrated in [43i–iii], involves two arguments, an experiencer and
a stimulus (the situation perceived): Kim in [i–ii] thus does not represent an argument of
see. We demonstrated this for the gerund-participial construction in §3.2.2, but it holds
for the other form-types too; this is why there is equivalence between [iiia] and We saw
United beat Spurs.
The gerund-participial in [43ii] has progressive meaning: in [i] we saw the whole
event of Kim’s leaving the bank, in [ii] a segment of it – the contrast is the same as that
between Kim left the bank and Kim was leaving the bank. The progressive auxiliary be
cannot be used (We saw Kim be leaving the bank), and passive be is likewise omitted to
give [iiia] instead of We saw Spurs be beaten by United. 42
The bare infinitival does not allow matrix passivisation, as is evident from [43ib]. The
to-infinitival, however, has a wider range of use in the passive than in the active:
[44] a. We saw Kim to leave the bank.    b. Kim was seen to leave the bank.
It is therefore tempting to see [44b] as filling the gap created by the ungrammaticality
of [43ib] (parallel to the case with make: We made Kim leave the bank ; Kim was made
leave the bank; Kim was made to leave the bank). Yet it is doubtful if the sense is quite the
same: [44b] has at least a trace of the cognitive component of meaning noted above for
[43iv]. Compare, for example:
[45] i They had seen him drive, so everyone decided to go by bus.
ii He had been seen to drive, so everyone decided to go by bus.
Notice that [i] is perfectly coherent, but [ii] is not. In [i] they had perceived the event,
and hence the manner of his driving, and we infer that it was the latter that made them
decide to go by bus. But in [ii] it is the fact of his driving that had been registered, and
this doesn’t provide an obvious reason for them to go by bus.
None of the other sense verbs shows quite the same range as see. The closest is feel but
construction [43iii] is here virtually restricted to reflexives or body parts (I felt myself/
my leg grabbed from behind ). With hear and overhear [iv] is virtually excluded in the
active (We’d heard him to be an impostor) and in the passive we have again the problem
of distinguishing between the senses of [i] and [iv]: we do not have He was heard to be an
impostor (where see would be quite normal), but only examples like He was heard to lock
the door, which is very close to They heard him lock the door. 43 Watch wholly excludes
the to-infinitival, whether active or passive. Notice and observe are hardly possible in
[iii], and notice is also marginal in [iv]. Smell is generally restricted to [ii], and hence is
listed in Class 3Cii below; it combines predominantly with burn (I can smell something
burning).
请先 登录 后评论
  • 1 关注
  • 1 收藏,3616 浏览
  • badaer 提出于 2022-04-24 16:41