求助老师们关于择比结构的疑问
It was not necessarily an asset’s own riskiness that is important to investor, so much as the contribution it makes to the volatility of the overall portfolio.
这个句子中前面的这个句子是强调句么?我觉得拿掉it is that 前面的这个句子依然成立,但又感觉强调句的that一般都是放在 an asset前面的吧?后面这个 so much as 是构成择比么?为什么so much as前面要用逗号隔开呢?
It was not necessarily an asset’s own riskiness that is important to investor, so much as the contribution it makes to the volatility of the overall portfolio.
=It was not necessarily an asset’s own riskiness so much as the contribution it makes to the volatility of the overall portfolio that is important to investor.
......not so much as.....,意为:与其说.....还不如说.....,字面理解句子:对于投资者最重要的事,与其说必然是资产自身的风险性还不如说是它对整体投资组合带来的不稳定性。
整体上是个强调句,被强调的部分是句子的主语,这个主语太长了,为了避免句子头重脚轻,就切成了两段,把“择比”中的后一个比较项单独拎出来放到了句尾。用个逗号隔开以免产生歧义呗,也是句子的意群与意群之间的自然停顿,便于读者理解句子。
查了查字典啥的,应该是这么理解吧。