如下列句子:
Rather, they contend, it was almost certainly the result of climatic shifts, prompted in part by cumulative effects of the el nino/la nina phenomenon on Pacific Ocean temperatures, culminating in a harsh winter in which huge numbers of salmon eggs were frozen.
——culminating in a harsh winter,如何确定culminating的逻辑主语是climatic shifts 还是cumulative effects呢?虽然从句意来说是后者,那能从语法上来判断吗,谢谢,(想知道为什么就不能是climatic shifts呢)
你知道从句义上来说,现在分词短语应该是修饰cumulative effects的。从语法上看,如果现在分词短语是修饰climatic shifts 的,那就是现在分词和过去分词都是修饰climatic shifts 的,二者为并列关系。二个状语并列修饰同一个名词,应该用并列连词连接这二个状语。但句子中并没有并列连词。所以语法上,现在分词短语不是与过去分词并列修饰climatic shifts ,而是修饰名词cumulative effects的。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!