动词occupy sb需要逻辑主语的疑惑?

CNN 10 《Uncertain Future of Popular Entertainment Venue》

They were not happy. They quote, unquote, "boycott" the film but it didn't really matter because there wasn't a theatrical footprint really to speak up. 

And, you know, it came at a time that families really needed something to do to occupy their children. 

The Troll sequel made more money for the studio in just three weeks of its digital release than the original did during five months in theaters. 

请教老师:

词典例句:

V-T If something occupies you, it requires your efforts, attention, or time. (某事物) 占用 (某人)

I had other matters to occupy me, during the day at least. 

我有别的事要做,至少白天要被占用。

严格来说,上面短文中 needed something to do to occupy their children.  是否要去掉to do, 即needed something to occupy their children. 因为occupy需要逻辑主语something。我的理解对吗?

 

请先 登录 后评论

最佳答案 2021-01-13 15:13

你去掉to do,句子也是正确的。但原句用to do也没有错。二个结构意义不同。你没有理由改动原句。

 families really needed something to do to occupy their children.

黑体部分为不定式短语作something的定语。不定式为to do的目的状语。例如,I have to do something to occupy my son. 这个不定式虽为目的状语,但这个不定式的逻辑主语不是句子的主语,而是句子的宾语。这就是所谓与宾语有关的状语。例如,I have to assign some house work to occupy my son. 不定式的逻辑主语为house work. 

你改为families really needed something to occupy their children.

不定式作need的宾补。


请先 登录 后评论

其它 0 个回答

  • 1 关注
  • 0 收藏,2469 浏览
  • bjxue 提出于 2021-01-11 18:31

相似问题