为什么不用过去分词而用现在分词

That would make their rulings more likely to be seen as separate from politics and, as a result, convincing as law.

这会让他们的裁决更被人视为是远离政治的，而且被奉为律例。

问题: convincing 从句义上应该是被动的，被看作，那为什么不用过去分词而用现在分词？

That would make their rulings more likely to be seen as separate from politics and, as a result, convincing as law.

1. 分词形容词 convinced 用来描述人，说明人”被说服”，引申为结果意义“相信；信服”。

2. 分词形容词 convincing 用来描述物，说明自身具有“令人信服的”特质。

3. 本句，形容词 convincing 在结构上与形容词 likely 并列，共同作 make 的宾语补足语，补充说明宾语 rulings （裁决。convincing 的逻辑主语）具有法律说服力。中间有并列and 连接，被 as a result 分隔。

That would make their rulings more likely to be seen as separate from politics and, as a result, convincing as law.

【翻译】那将使他们的裁决更有可能被视为独立于政治，而且，因此具有法律说服力。

刘永科 - 教育出版集团英语总顾问 & 英语系列图书主编

擅长：语法理论,语言学,文化背景 | 采纳率 86% | 回答于 2020-11-14 13:58

其它 0 个回答