I've got enough propofol to put an elephant to sleep.
He has enough money to buy the whole city.
He is man enough to admit his mistake.
I don't know him well enough to ask him for help.
1.请问enough...to do和enough to do是一样的吗?这两个结构应该都算是程度状语还是结果状语?
2.在enough...to do这个结构中,to do是定语还是状语?
比如:I've got enough propofol to put an elephant to sleep.如果这句话不定式不是定语而是状语的原因是“propofol不是人不能发出动作”,那I have enough man to do the job中,man是人可以发出动作,那to do不就是定语吗?
I've got enough propofol to put an elephant to sleep. (定语)
He has enough money to buy the whole city. (定语)
He is man enough to admit his mistake. (程度或结果状语)
I don't know him well enough to ask him for help. (程度或结果状语)
1. 表示“拥有;具有” 之意的 have got 或 have,不可以使用状语修饰,所以排除不定式作状语。此外, enough 作限定词修饰名词,跟其他限定词 adequate, sufficient, plenty of, a lot of, much 等属于一种类型,enough 与这些词没有本质的区别,我们不能认定: enough 可以表示程度,这些就不可以。还有一个关键问题是,不定式的逻辑主语可以是被修饰语,不是句子主语。
2. 当 enough 修饰形容词或副词,表示达到某种程度时(man 实际用作形容词,具有形容词 manly 或 bravely 的意义;well 是副词),不定式才是程度或结果状语。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!
成分分析有好处,但其弊端也显露无遗。多少学生在一些简单的句子面前束手无策啊。
我们试从语言最自然的属性,即说者/听者的焦点在哪里来分析一下
He has money to buy the whole city.
这句话在表达时,先表达的是He has money,此时,听者的注意焦点在money上,听者的兴趣点围绕着money, money for what? money to do what?即后面的不定式进一步说明了这个money的各种性质/特点
He has enough money to buy the whole city.
这个时候,听者的兴趣点分散了,听者对enough也产生了兴趣,enough to what extent? and money to do what?
所谓的成分分析是不能解答这样的思考过程的。