请老师帮忙看下这两个句子:
1.电影里看到一句话:What would help me even more is if you worte a letter to the parole board telling them i have changed.这句话是不是不太对:
1)表语从句不能用if引导,这里怎么出现了if?
2)worte用了过去式代表的是虚拟语气吗?但表语从句的虚拟语气其主语不应该是表示建议、命令、要求、提议的词,而这里却用了主语从句,这似乎不符合虚拟语气的使用前提。
3)所以综合以上两点,是不是可以认为这句话错误,仅仅是口语化的说法?
2.I wasn't sure if you would be back.请问这句话中,表语形容词后的if从句和that从句一样是形容词的补足语吗?另外如果作表语的形容词后面是whether、what、where等引导的从句也算形容词的补足语吗?还是说仅仅只限于that从句?
What would help me even more is if you wrote a letter to the parole board telling them I have changed.
这个句子属于口语中的语法错误。注意主句的is,和 I have changed的时态,由此可知what从句和if从句的谓语形式都是虚拟语气,表示与将来事实相反的假设。
我们先把这个句子稍作改动,句子都用陈述语气表示事实。
It really helped me that you wrote to the parole board telling them I had changed.
为了清楚说明假拟分裂句,我们不用外置结构,直接用that从句作主语:
That you wrote to the parole board telling them I had changed really helped me.
划线部分为主语,后接动宾结构。为了突出、强调主句,我们可以用假拟分裂句,即用融合型关系代词what取代that从句:What really helped me, 然后加上系词be, 让that从句作表语,得到下句:
What really helped me was that you wrote to the parole board telling them I had changed.
这样就把原来主句的主谓宾结构,改成了主系表的主句结构,表语为确认性表语。表语位于句末信息中心位置,从而得到强调。
假拟分裂句都是确认性表语,即表语应该是名词性结构。
I need a good rest. 普通句式。
It is a good rest that I need. it分裂句(即强调句型)。
What I need is a good rest. 假拟分裂句,突出a good rest.
A good rest is what I need. 倒装的假拟分裂句。
网友的句子中,What would help me even more作主语,is后应该接名词性结构,但that从句无法表示虚拟条件,于是说话人直接用if从句作了表语。而if从句(条件)是不能作表语的。所以这个句子是语法错误,虽然听话人能明白说话人想要表达什么。正确的表达应该是:
It would help me even more if you wrote a letter to the parole board telling them I have changed.
it指代if从句的内容。为人称代词it的前照应指代。主从句位置可以颠倒:
If you wrote a letter to the parole board telling them I have changed, it would help me even more.
I wasn't sure if you would be back.
if=whether,意为:是否。
表语形容词语义不完整时,通常用介词短语、不定式或that从句补足。现代语法称其为形容词的补足语。wh-从句本可以作介词的宾语,构成介词短语作形容词的补足语。例如:
I wasn't sure (of) when you would be back.
通常认为that从句作形容词补足语时是名词性从句,而wh-从句作为名词性从句受了that从句可以直接位于表语形容词后的影响,介词就被省略了,形成名词性wh-从句直接位于表语形容词后作其补足语的现象。其实wh-从句前加上介词语法都是正确的,只不过现在省略介词更为常见而已。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!