你的问题有点奇怪。语言表达是灵活多样的,丰富多彩的,不可能总是用一种表达。况且你的句子用现在分词和并列谓语在侧重点上也有区别:1. Jim attacked a boy, accusing him of his improper behavior.句中 attacked 为谓语动词,是叙述的重点,后面的现在分词短语起补充说明作用。2. Jim attacked a boy and accused him o...
回答于 2022-05-29 18:47
我觉得只能填不定冠词: We all know that Cindy is a smarter student than John in our class. 若用定冠词,则不能用 than,比如可以说: We all know that Cindy is the smarter student of the two.
回答于 2022-05-29 18:39
类似你的句子中的what,不同的语法著作或辞典有不同的叫法(作为英语学习者,它叫什么并不重要,重要的是你要能正确理解的用法和意思;理解它的重点是要知道它在意义上相当于“先行词+关系代词”):1. 有的人称之为“缩合连接代词”(如《薄冰高级英语语法》,薄冰同时认为缩合连接代词(condensed conjunctive pronoun)由于其...
回答于 2022-05-18 07:34
不可以省略,因为两者时态不一样。There is no more reason to invite him than there was to invite her. 但如果从句有明确的时态状语,可以体现从句的时态,则也可以省略。如:He is better today than (he was) yesterday. 下面句子中从句中的 there is 可以省略,因为它与主句的 there is 时态相同:There is more fibr...
回答于 2022-05-11 17:26
主句中的 more 为比较项,它在比较分句中的对应项原则上应省略,所以正确且无争议的表达是:Kim lost more at the races yesterday than I earned at my job in a year.(标准用法)至于在 than 后面加上 what,比较分句就没有缺省项了,在口语或某些方言中有人这样用,但不算规范用法:Kim lost more at the races yesterd...
回答于 2022-05-10 17:16
Those are better than what we saw in the shops yesterday. 句中的what属于正确用法,不仅正确、规范,而且不可以去掉:误:Those are better than we saw in the shops yesterday. 正:Those are better than what we saw in the shops yesterday. 注:句中的 what 属于比较对象,不可以省略。根据剑桥语法,有时比较项...
回答于 2022-05-01 22:26
This is such a difficult problem as can't be solved by us.我觉得句子没有错误。根据传统语法:as 为关系代词,指代先行词 problem,在从句用作主语。根据现代语法:as 为连词,引导比较分句,由于比较分句的主语为主句比较项 a difficult problem的对应项,习惯上要省略,所以as后面的分句空缺主语。
回答于 2022-04-28 23:18
句子没有错误。因为他昨天可能真的到了。If Tom arrived yesterday, he will come to see me tomorrow.句意:如果Tom昨天到了,他明天就会来看我。比较使用虚拟语气的句子:If Tom had arrived yesterday, he would have come to see me.要是Tom昨天就到了,他就会来看过我了。实际情况是:他昨天没有到,所以他也就没有来...
回答于 2022-04-28 23:07