1. 首先要说的是,韦氏词典的解释(Both lit and lighted are acceptable and standard, and have been all along. The evidence in the Merriam-Webster files shows both forms to be used about equally)并非专指这两个词作定语时的用法,而是泛指lighted和lit作为过去式和过去分词的用法。因为在传统英语语法、词典和...
回答于 4天前
不是the place...之前省略了when。the moment (或 the moment that)本身是引导时间状语的连词,意思接近as soon as或immediately。
回答于 2024-11-22 16:32
章振邦认为单个副词做方式状语不能被It-分裂句强调。其依据是Quirk的A Comprehensive Grammar of The English Language。 该书8.83节指出:由单个副词表示的方式状语通常不能成为肯定式It-cleft sentence的中心(Normally, when manner adjuncts are realized by adverbs, they cannot be the focus of a cleft senten...
回答于 2024-10-31 20:20
刚看到alex119网友已做了很好的回答,我认为简明扼要,应予以采纳。我是才看到邀答私信,正好之前收集过这一问题的资料,然后就改写了一下。既然写了,就发一下吧。句① lf he be found guilty, he would be sent to prison.本句中从句的be是虚拟语气现在时,从句的would表明作者认为可能性很小。整句为非真实条件句。但分句...
回答于 2024-10-31 20:14
1. 一般通用语法或基础语法教程都会指出:who/what用于无明确范围的选择;which用于有明确范围的选择。这基本上没有问题,因为这样的语法条文同时也符合我们日常所见。2. 但如果再深化对上述语法问题的探讨,就会发现毫无保留地遵从前述语法条文就会呈现出自身的弊端。因为在一群(或一批)确定的人(或物)做出选择时,用w...
回答于 2024-09-08 19:40
句1 的would宜视为不带词汇意义。首先,如果用(al)though以正常语序把句子改写成 Though they searched, they...,其基本意思相同。其次,如果把would换成更为常见的might,句子也表达同样的意思。由此可见原句的would(或might)只具句法功能,不具词汇意义。 句2 的这种句式不常见,可能有点老旧,本人不太熟悉,不敢...
回答于 2024-08-13 16:03
此处章振邦《新编高级英语语法》所称的评注性状语(wisely)就是夸克语法体系中的外加状语,具体说就是内容外加状语的B类:价值评估。wisely属于其中的Group (i)。Quirk说的很清楚:These express a judgment on what is being said as a whole and they normally apply the same judgment simultaneously to the subject o...
回答于 2024-06-09 17:50
1.当并列连词直接连接动词的情况下,通常视为并列句主语的省略。如(01)She stood up and went out=She stood up and she went out.2. 但有观点认为,如果两个谓语动词表达了不可分离的一个过程,或者两个动词具有直接的因果关系,则宜视为并列谓语。(02)He fired and killed the wolf. 此句宜理解为并列谓语,因为f...
回答于 2024-06-09 14:01
1. I would receive £1,000 a year more是正常的表述,没有问题。下面的例句摘自时代周刊和经济学人杂志: We would provide $600 million a year more for schools. As a result, the importing world will lave to spend about $35 billion a year more for the same quantity of oil. These cost billions...
回答于 2024-05-24 09:54