1. Although paper was never as cheap as it has become today, it was far less expensive than parchment, and therefore more people could afford to buy books.
2. How do predators affect populations of the prey animals? The answer is not as simple as might be thought.
之前认为在比较项修饰的对象前后一致的情况下,比较项以及比较项向上渗透的一级(比较项的修饰对象)的对应项都要省略。但是看到了两个这样的句子。一个省略了比较项向上渗透的一级的对应项,一个没省略比较项向上渗透的一级的对应项。
请教一下曹老师,在比较分句中,如果比较项修饰的对象前后一致,那么比较项向上渗透的一级的对应项是否一定要省略?我没看明白你说的“比较项向上渗透的一级的对应项”指的是什么。我只是对以上几个句子中比较分句的省略做些说明。
Although paper was never as cheap as it has become today, 主句的比较项为as cheap,其对应项在比较分句作表语,必须省略。所以比较分句become的表语位置形成空位。
it was far less expensive than parchment, 主句比较项为less expensive,其对应项在比较分句中作表语必须省略,比较分句的系词was选择性省略(不省略也可以)。
The answer is not as simple as might be thought. 主句比较项为as simple,其对应项在比较分句中的嵌入分句(主语从句)中作成分,嵌入分句可以选择性省略。本句就是省略了比较分句中的主语从句。如果补全则为:
The answer is not as simple as it might be thought that it would be。由此可以看出比较对应项是would be的表语,必须省略。这种补全的句子在实际写作中是很少出现的。通常都会省略形式主语it 和 外置的主语从句,得到你实际看到的句子。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!