一般情况下，当否定副词“not”参与构成一个句子的否定式时，如果缺乏“操作词”，则需要添置“操作词”，然后再将“not”置于“操作词”的后方。然而，存在着这样一种非常规的否定式，那就是否定副词“not”直接被置于行为动词或连系动词后，而不需要再额外添置“操作词”，如下列两个例句中的加粗部分所示：

Some people wrote their names, but others corrupted the text or wrote obscenities. One person wrote: " I am Bi, Female & Proud. I want not god who is disappointed in this " (quoted in Paine 2013, 23). This provoked strong reactions from many Christians, and some people demanded that the city's director of cultural affairs should resign.

—ACAD: Scandinavian Studies,《Exhibiting Religion-Displaying Religious Heritage in a Post-secular Sweden》

The main difficulties in a choice of statistical method are that patient is not sure to visit Clinics with definite intervals or in the days when he feels not well; quite the reverse———he prefers then to stay at home.

—Environmental Health,《A Global Access Science Source》

求教各位前辈，这种非常规的否定式，其背后所蕴含的逻辑是什么？

另外，这种非常规否定式，除了能运用于否定副词“not”之外，是否还能运用于其他否定词？