2 when定语从句理解困惑

请教专家老师: 

新概念3-35课:

The word justice is usually associated with courts of law. We might say that justice has been done when a man's innocence or guilt has been proved beyond doubt. Justice is part of the complex machinery of the law. Those who seek it undertake an arduous journey and can never be sure that they will find it. Judges, however wise or eminent, are human and can make mistakes.

    There are rare instances when justice almost ceases to be an abstract concept. Reward or punishment are meted out quite independent of human interference. At such times, justice acts like a living force. When we use a phrase like 'it serves him right', we are, in part, admitting that a certain set of circumstances has enabled justice to act of its own accord.

    When a thief was caught on the premises of large jewellery store on morning, the shop assistants must have found it impossible to resist the temptation to say 'it serves him right.' The shop was an old converted house with many large, disused fireplaces and tall, narrow chimneys. Towards midday, a girl heard a muffed cry coming from behind on of the walls. As the cry was repeated several times, she ran to tell the manager who promptly rang up the fire brigade. The cry had certainly come form one of the chimneys, but as there were so many of them, the fire fighters could not be certain which one it was. They located the right chimney by tapping at the walls and listening for the man's cries. After chipping through a wall which was eighteen inches thick, they found that a man had been trapped in the chimney. As it was extremely narrow, the man was unable to move, but the fire fighters were eventually able to free him by cutting a huge hole in the wall. The sorry-looking, blackened figure that emerged, admitted at once that he had tried to break into the shop during the night but had got stuck in the chimney. He had been there for nearly ten hours. Justice had been done even before the man was handed over to the police.

1) 为什么不是are humans ?  instances when 引导定语从句很难理解instances的时间含义?如果说成instances where则能理解,可否?

2) 这个结构quite independent of human interference不会分析,有人说是方式状语,形容词短语作方式吗?但感觉是主语补语,可否?

3) we are admitting 静态动词可以使用进行时吗?must have found 我感觉这里只能理解为从现在的角度去推测,而不能理解为站在过去的角度去推测,不知对否?

请先 登录 后评论

最佳答案 2022-03-04 08:29

1 human在此为形容词,作表语表示主语的性质、特征。为什么一定要用名词表示身份、类别或职业呢?《韦氏高阶》对instance的释义之一: an occasion of something happening。对occasion的释义之一:a special event or timea particular time when something happens。所以instance作为先行词,用when引导定语从句有什么难以理解呢?

2 quite independent of human interference 为形容词短语,形容词作状语在本网已经讨论过N次了,你没有看到吗?形容词不能作方式状语。不要滥用主语补足语这个术语。这个形容词短语分析为伴随状语。谓语动作发生时主语所处的状态。

3 你凭什么认为admit是静态动词?admit的英英释义之一:to say usually in an unwilling way that you accept or do not deny the truth or existence of (something),即admitsay的意思是动态动词。当admit作谓语动词用一般现在时,是因为你说当前这个句子,say的事件发生,你说完句子,动作也就结束。所以通常admit不用进行体。这和announcedeclare通常不用进行体为同一个道理,即动词本身就是说话,句子结束,动作也结束,这是不用进行体的道理。不能因为这些动词通常不用进行体就误以为它们是静态动词。进行体的使用原则是描述会结束而未结束的情景。不会结束的情景不用进行体,这适合静态动词,因为静态动词没有结束意义。已经结束的也不用进行体,这就适合admitdeclareannounce这类动词。你这个句子中,当你说“It serves him right.”这句话的同时,你其实就是在承认...=your are saying...,所以这个特定的场合admit用现在进行时是完全可以的。

请先 登录 后评论

其它 0 个回答

  • 2 关注
  • 1 收藏,1677 浏览
  • ykqstudy 提出于 2022-02-09 16:19