谓语为被动语态其后成分分析

1.The former has been put down to social effects, such as a strong tradition of valuing education.

2.The latter was seen as a consequence of genetic isolation.

疑问：

1.个人理解1句还原主动sb(S)has put(V)the former(O)down to social effects(C)。原句被动 to social effects 请问是变成了主语补足语还是状语呢？

2.同理2句的as a consequence of...是主语补足语还是状语呢？

麻烦老师解答一下我的疑惑，十分感谢！

1.The former has been put down to social effects, such as a strong tradition of valuing education.

2.The latter was seen as a consequence of genetic isolation.

句1，无论句子是主动语态，或是被动语态，黑体部分都是状语，是广义的地点状语，由于 put down...to... 成为固定搭配，意为 “把......归结于”，所以to social effects 为必具性状语，不可缺少。不存在宾语补足语或主语补足语之说。

句2，黑体部分是主语补足语；句子在主动语态时，是宾语补足语。

刘永科 - 教育出版集团英语总顾问 & 英语系列图书主编

擅长：语法理论,语言学,文化背景 | 采纳率 86% | 回答于 2021-05-04 12:13

其它 0 个回答