2018年高考英语北京卷有个expect后接动名词的句子:
But she expects using the chemical in some kind of industrial process—not simply “millions of worms thrown on top of the plastic.
为什么这里在expect 后面接动名词呢?英语不是要说 expect to do sth 吗?为什么这里的是用动名词的 expect doing sth?
附 2018年北京卷expect后接动名词 doing 的相关材料:
Humans produce more than 300 million tons of plastic every year. Almost half of that winds up in landfills(垃圾填埋场), and up to 12 million tons pollute the oceans. So far there is no effective way to get rid of it, but a new study suggests an answer may lie in the stomachs of some hungry worms.
Researchers in Spain and England recently found that the worms of the greater wax moth can break down polyethylene, which accounts for 40% of plastics. The team left 100 wax worms on a commercial polyethylene shopping bag for 12 hours, and the worms consumed and broke down about 92 milligrams, or almost 3% of it. To confirm that the worms’ chewing alone was not responsible for the polyethylene breakdown, the researchers made some worms into paste(糊状物) and applied it to plastic films. 14 hours later the films had lost 13% of their mass—apparently broken down by enzymes(酶) from the worms’ stomachs. Their findings were published in Current Biology in 2017.
Federica Bertocchini, co-author of the study, says the worms’ ability to break down their everyday food—beeswax—also allows them to break down plastic. “Wax is a complex mixture, but the basic bond in polyethylene, the carbon-carbon bond, is there as well,” she explains. “The wax worm evolved a method or system to break this bond. ”
Jennifer DeBruyn, a microbiologist at the University of Tennessee, who was not involved in the study, says it is not surprising that such worms can break down polyethylene. But compared with previous studies, she finds the speed of breaking down in this one exciting. The next step, DeBruyn says, will be to identify the cause of the breakdown. Is it an enzyme produced by the worm itself or by its gut microbes(肠道微生物)?
Bertocchini agrees and hopes her team’s findings might one day help employ the enzyme to break down plastics in landfills. But she expects using the chemical in some kind of industrial process—not simply “millions of worms thrown on top of the plastic.”
按mikee的提示,原文确实是envisions。根据网友贴的内容搜到原文:https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/plastic-eating-worms-could-inspire-waste-degrading-tools1/
不懂国内出题规则,为何要在原文改动一两个字?有时会给学生造成很大困惑。主要是搜外网毕竟不是太方便。
可能是命题人在改写时出了问题,正如曹老师所说,可以将envision改成imagine啊,为什么去改写expect呢?
我赞同刘老师的解释,即不定式作宾语,不定式的动作是主语自己做的动作。如果动词的语义决定了宾语的动作不可能是主语自己做的,而是别人做的,就不能用不定式作宾语,而需要用动名词。例如,suggest/advise/recommend doing sth. 也许正是这个原因促使作者使用了 She expects using...。
但是,和suggest等动作的词义本身排除主语为作宾语的非谓语动词的施动者不同,expect的词义本身不排除主语是宾语动作的施动者。词典介绍expect的用法时,并没有expect doing sth的用法。所以我认为,作者还是误用了动名词。因为expect 有 expect sb to do sth, expect sth to be done, expect that从句,expect+名词短语等多种结构表示类似意义,而没有必要用动名词作expect的宾语。所以,我认为这是作者的一个失误。作者本可以使用下面结构之一表达同样的意思,而不是用动名词作宾语:
But she expects the chemical to be used in some kind of industrial process—not simply “millions of worms thrown on top of the plastic.
But she expects that the chemical will be used in some kind of industrial process—not simply “millions of worms thrown on top of the plastic.
But she expects the use of the chemical in some kind of industrial process—not simply “millions of worms thrown on top of the plastic.
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!
But she expects using the chemical in some kind of industrial process — not simply " millions of worms thrown on top of the plastic."
expect 这种接动名词的用法,实际就是接名词的用法。意思等于说:she expects the use of the chemical in...,
1. 如果一个及物动词可以接不定式作宾语,其逻辑主语一定是句子的主语。例如:She expects to go. 说明她本人亲自去。凡是使用不定式作宾语的情况,说明不定式的动作是将来的、未完成的动作。
2. 如果一个及物动词可以接动名词作宾语,动名词一般表示泛指意义(即:动作的逻辑主语不明确)或完成意义(即:动作早于谓语动词)。除此之外,如果表示将来意义仍然使用动名词,则带有建议性质,其逻辑主语就不是句子的主语,而是泛指他人。using 这个动作,本句的主语 she 无能力做到,而是期待着别人去做。除了expect 之外,suggest doing,advise doing,也属这种用法。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!