我随便聊几句，文不对题，题主见谅。

题主这个话题挺好。当年作为一个见到省略句就不知所措的人（最弱的时候，并列句中的省略成分竟然看不出来（苦笑）），如今算是渐渐入了门。在朋友的推荐下，我粗浅地翻看过三本省略专著：张克礼 刘春健编著《英语中的省略现象》；田雨三 刘养之 合编《英语省略句》；黄关福《英语中的省略》。这三本出的有点早，都是80年代初期的。如果最近有人再出新的就好了。

省略确实大有研究的必要。如果把母语人士写的复杂的省略句解析出来，特别有成就感。如果不能把省略的部分精确还原，就无法准确翻译出来。

网友举的例子属于句内省略。我见过段落内省略，在本网站提过，都得到专家们的精准解答。

还见过一次段落间上下文省略：

There are two scenarios for how this will play out. One is that ministers push on with UK Reach, and substances are pulled from the British market as manufacturers conclude that registration costs make low-volume products unviable. The so-called “salt-and-pepper” additives used in tiny quantities in paints are particularly vulnerable. The flow going the other way is already shrinking. Only 70% of the British firms that registered chemicals with the ECHA before Brexit have started transferring their dossiers to new legal entities in Europe, the regulator notes. “We’ll become very insular, and they’ll become equally self-absorbed,” says Mr Clarke. As a result, Britain would be a less attractive place to open an assembly line.

The second scenario is that UK Reach founders. The deadlines could be pushed back further, or the new rules left unenforced. With an empty database, says Michael Warhurst of CHEM Trust, an environmental charity, the regulator in Liverpool would be less able than the one in Helsinki to spot hazards, or to defend its decisions against deep-pocketed companies in court.