老师们好。
2016高考江苏卷C篇有这样一段话:
The most recent powerful Nino, in 1997-98, killed around 21,000 people and caused damage worth $36 billion around the globe. But such Ninos come with months of warning, and so much is known about how they happen that governments can prepare. According to the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), however, just 12% of disaster-relief funding in the past two decades has gone on reducing risks in advance, rather than recovery and rebuilding afterwards. This is despite evidence that a dollar spent on risk-reduction saves at least two on reconstruction.
我的疑问是:
1. 经查证,这篇文章的原材料来自《经济学人》international/2015/11/07/disaster-foretold,原文用的That is...。那么,原材料That is该如何分析?
2. 江苏高考题把That is改为 This is是否是对原That is的误读?为什么?
本句,指示代词用this 和 that,都没有问题。表达说话人对事件的“指向”,this 和 that 主要分别用来指代“近、远”两个概念。
This is despite evidence that a dollar spent on risk-reduction saves at least two on reconstruction.
【翻译】这样做根本不顾及已有的证据,即:一美元用于降低风险,节省了用于重建的至少两美元。
【分析】这是一个含有同位语从句的复合句。
1. This指代前文说的事情。
2. despite evidence:不顾及证据;对证据视而不见。在本句作表语。despite:介词,意为“不在乎,不管,不顾”。
3. that a dollar spent on risk-reduction saves at least two on reconstruction.是evidence的同位语。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!