2 动名词的逻辑主语

But the law was later struck down by the courts for violating free speech.

violating在这里是动名词做介宾的用法吗?动名词的逻辑主语一定是句子的主语吗

请先 登录 后评论

最佳答案 2018-12-09 22:30

praise sb  for doing sth

strike down sth for sth

for doing sth 为原因状语。praise的语义决定了动名词的逻辑主语是宾语而不是句子的主语。传统语法将for doing sth分析为原因状语。现代语法将这个for doing sth分析为动词的补足语,即使动词语义完整不可缺少的结构。正因为它是动词的补足语,不是状语,因此不可以移至句首。例如:

But the law was later struck down by the courts for violating free speech.

But for violating free speech the law was later struck down by the courts. (误)

We praised her for winning the competition.

For winning the competition we praised her. (误)

如果我们将for改为because of, 则为原因状语,而不再是动词的补足语。此时动名词的逻辑主语如果不是句子的主语,就要用动名词复合结构。

But the law was later struck down by the courts because of it(s) violating free speech.

But because of it(s) violatinig free speech, the law was later struck down by the courts.

We praised her because of her winning the competition.

Because of her winning the competition, we praised her.

同理,stop/prevent sb from doing sth 这样的结构中,from介词短语并不是状语,而是动词的补足语,不可以移至句首。动名词的逻辑主语是宾语而不是句子的主语。

如果能够区分谓语动词的补足语和状语,那么就可以说介词+动名词作状语(即不是动词的补足语),动名词的逻辑主语必须是句子的主语,否则动名词就要用复合结构,表示出自己的逻辑主语。


请先 登录 后评论

其它 2 个回答

刘永科   - 教育出版集团英语总顾问 & 英语系列图书主编
擅长:语法理论,语言学,文化背景

这个问题,要具体情况具体判断。如果是主动语态的话,那么,逻辑主语则是句子的宾语,不是主语:

She was praised for winning the competition.

We praised her for winning the competition.

(红色成分是动名词的逻辑主语)


此外,同样都是主动语态,则需要根据语境判断:

He received praise from his colleagues for winning the prize. 

他因获得该奖而受到同事们的称赞。

He praised me for winning the prize.

因为我获了奖他表扬我。

(红色成分是动名词的逻辑主语)





请先 登录 后评论
陈才   - 英语教师
擅长:中考英语,词法问题

But the law was later struck down by the courts for violating free speech.

参考译文:但是这条法律因为违法了言论自由后来被法庭给废止了/取缔了。

解答如下:

以上为介词短语for violating free speech作原因状语

violating free speech为动名词短语作介词for的宾语。动名词逻辑主语是句子主语“the law

(1)主动:strike down a law=废止一条法律

(2)被动:a law be struck down=一条法律被废止

strike down  vt.废止,取缔,终结(非法的法律或规定) 

The Supreme Court today struck down a law that prevents criminals from profiting from books or movies about their crimes.

最高法院今天废止了一项关于禁止罪犯把其罪行写成书或拍成电影而从中牟利的法律



请先 登录 后评论
  • 3 关注
  • 4 收藏,10558 浏览
  • 清cyx 提出于 2018-12-04 23:52

相似问题