The question of when the troops should leave would be decided by consensus.
The question why they were defeated was answered
第二个是同位语从句,第一个是什么结构?感觉两者差不多,但是又有区别?感觉在第一个句子里,去掉 of不就是同位语从句吗,那么为什么还要加上of多此一举了?
先谢谢各位了!
正如网友所说,第一句如果去掉of就是同位语从句。那么有了of,则of 后接名词性从句构成介词短语,介词短语作定语,表示同位关系,但介词短语本身不能做同位语。用不用介词of, 意义没有差别,只是习惯问题。
名词性疑问分句做介词的宾语时,多数情况下介词是可以省去的。例如:
I am not sure (of) who he is.
I have no idea (of) when he left.
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!
(1)The question of when the troops should leave would be decided by consensus.
解答如下:
以上句子为:“名词the question”+介词短语短语of when the troops should leave+“句子谓语would be decided”+“状语by concensus”结构,即介词短语of when the troops should leave修饰/限定前面的名词“the question”
(2)The question why they were defeated was answered
解答如下:
以上句子为“名词the question”+ “同位语从句why they were defeated”+“谓语was answered”
总结:
(1)有介词of为介词短语作后置定语,修饰前面名词the question,即对前面的名词起修饰/限定的作用。
(2)没有介词of,为同位语从句,对前面名词the question起一个解释补充说明的其内容的作用。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!