老师好!
Hearing my wife’s cry, the policeman was assured that I was a thief. As a result, he pulled me down the ladder. But as he was about to take me to the police station, my wife was able to see me clearly and realized her mistake. Then she tried to explain to him who I was and asked him to release me. Finally the policeman believed her explanation. She apologized to the policeman, and then the policeman apologized to me, too.
这段话中标记的这句话,Hearing是非谓语动词,其逻辑主语是主句主语the policeman,
但是我不会区分是现在分词做原因状语 还是 伴随状语。
假设做原因状语:因为听见了我老婆的叫喊,警察确信我是小偷。
假设做伴随状语:(向上爬梯子,同时)听见了我老婆的叫喊,警察确信我是小偷。
期待老师解答!
分词状语究竟是什么状语,是根据逻辑分析出来的,而不是语法形式告诉你的。根据分词与谓语动词之间的逻辑关系,分词可能是时间、原因、条件、方式、让步、结果等状语。如果分词的动作只是和谓语动词同时发生,看不出其他关系,这是就分析为伴随状语。分词很少作目的状语。就这个句子而言,显然警察是因为听到妻子的叫喊声才以为男子是小偷。因此分析为原因状语。理解为时间状语也可以。其实说话人也并没有刻意要表明这是什么状语,否则他完全可以用状语从句表示相应的状语。网友完全应该根据自己的理解分析。注意分词动作和谓语动作之间的逻辑关系即可。
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!
同意曹老师解答!
解答如下:
Hearing my wife’s cry, the policeman was assured that I was a thief.
=Because/As the policeman heard my wife’s cry, the policeman was assured that I was a thief.(当作原因状语来理解)
=When the policeman heard my wife’s cry, the policeman was assured that I was a thief.(当作时间状语来理解)
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!