It was reported that another bridge was to be built across is the yangtse River.
这个 that 后面的从句是不是一个表语从句?
你的这个句子是病句。应改为:It was reported that another bridge was to be built across the Yangtse River. 句中is是多余的,可能是你打字时疏忽所致。
这显然是个主语从句。It是形式主语。
类似的例句如:
1. It was true that water freezes at thirty-two degrees Fahrenheit.
2. It is said that he has gone to shanghai.
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!
It was reported that another bridge was to be built across is the yangtse River.
这个 that 后面的从句是不是一个表语从句?
回答如下:
首先:根据英语中,1个连词对应2个谓语动词,2个连词对应3个谓语动词原则,显然以上句子是错误的,因为有3个谓语动词,却只有1个连词.
谓语动词(1)was reported
谓语动词(2)was to be built
谓语动词(3)is the Yangtese River
(连词的个数=n(个);那么谓语动词个数=(n+1)个, 适合任何英语句子,可是说是适用于所有英语的万能原则,如果连词个数=0,那么谓语动词个数=0+1=1;即只有1个谓语动词,那么这个句子一定是简单句;如果连词=1,那么谓语动词个数1+1=2个,具有2个谓语动词句子,有可能是并列句,也有可能是主从复合句,如果连词是从属连词,那么就是主从复合句,如果连词为并列连词,就是并列句。)
(备注:用以上原则对帮助分析复杂的长难句非常有帮助,也很有效果,长那句是指,连词个数至少在4个以上,也就谓语动词个数在5个以上长难句分析。)
处理方法:
(1)增加连词的个数
(2)减少谓语动词的个数
按照(减少谓语动词个数的方法)修改如下:
(1)It was reported (that连词) another bridge was to be built across the Yangtse River.
(2)It was reported( that连词) another bridge to be built acrossis the Yangtse River.
以上2个句子都满足以上原则,1个连词对应2个谓语动词,一个是主句谓语动词,一个为从句谓语动词. 因此属于正确句子.
(特别备注:以上都是it作形式主语,that从句作真正主语的,主语从句)
如果觉得我的回答对您有用,请随意打赏。你的支持将鼓励我继续创作!