Admission to the school is by examination only.这个句子是牛津高阶第三版修订版1981上的,在admission词条下。把only放在by前面当然是可以的。如果硬要按照by examination的搭配来查找,only在前在后例句都少,两种用法都有在用,但是句法不同,举几个:1.Officially, enrolment was only by examination, with 2000 chi...
回答于 2022-11-07 12:35
没想到这样的问题会引起如此反响,看些例句吧:1.The people that are doing illegal things in other countries - like begging - are already there. There won't be many to join them.(BBC)2.There won't be enough people to work. There'll only be older people.(Forbes)3.The trouble is, though, that unless some...
回答于 2022-11-02 14:01
回答于 2022-10-31 14:40
这个不能理解成https://www.cpsenglish.com/question/60108中我说的那种简单理解!in the summer where you come from中如果where表示抽象的时间,那后面的from怎么理解?说不通!理解成in the place where就可以,而且summer前有个the,说明不是泛指的夏天,而是你来自于某个地方的夏天,比较具体,用the恰如其分。至于前...
回答于 2022-10-21 11:55
这虽然是一个新概念4上的一个老问题,但是一直没看到好的语法解释。可以明确说明的是:用a brief period of lying down当然是可以的,而没有of的a brief period lying down也没错。看到大家在那争论,有些跑题了,之前就说过,内卷确实没意义,我们需要的是有意义的外卷。问题倒很简单:a brief period lying down到底是什么...
回答于 2022-10-20 12:35
薄冰老师曾经就解答过类似问题,你可以看看,在“薄冰英语常见共性问题解答”一书第199页。我只引用一部分:“spend作为及物动词时,后须接宾语(多指时间或金钱)如 “介 词 on+ 宾语 ”或加“(介 词 in)+动 名 词 +宾 语 ”。如 :I spent a lot of money on books.I spent a lot of money (in)buying books.介 词 in 可省去...
回答于 2022-09-16 13:45
1.Thousands of tons of waste matter are being dumped in the ocean.(Longman Collocations Dictionary and Thesaurus)2.Thousands of tons of earth were moved to build the dam.(Longman Collocations Dictionary and Thesaurus)3.Thousands of tons of filth and sewage pour into the Ganges every day.(科林斯...
回答于 2022-09-07 11:19
刘老师不知道去哪了,我也很久没见他回帖。有点时间就说说我的看法。自然形成的东西,没有施动者或者说不清楚施动者,确实有主动和被动两种用法,它们似乎并无区别。但是你说的这个改错题不是这么回事。They will be formed over thousands or even millions of years.这句话的意思是煤,油和天然气形成的过程经历了thousan...
回答于 2022-06-16 19:06
看你的问题没人回复。我就说一下。这里面有个搭配的问题。The old man looked happy with laughter.这一句用laughter确实是合适的,laughter是不可数名词。而laugh是可数名词,with a laugh这个搭配是没问题的,只是如果用with a laugh替换with laughter,语法上没毛病,但是句意就挺奇怪。with laughing一般用在die with l...
回答于 2022-06-16 10:34
类似问题很早前就讨论过了。既然再度提出来我也说说。Quirk所说(1260页)确实不妥,同一本书在第367页:She's not the brilliant dancer ( that) she used to be.这就自相矛盾。在随后出版的“A Students Grammar of the English Language”一书中是这么说的:“When the verb in the relative clause is be, the complement...
回答于 2022-06-05 17:46